[Identification of factors associated with low access to psychiatric care. Concerning 516 psychiatric assessments carried out in the framework of the local medical committee of Martinique]. / Identification de facteurs associés à un faible recours aux soins spécialisés en psychiatrie. À propos de 516 cas d'expertises psychiatriques réalisées dans le cadre du Comité médical départemental de Martinique.

OBJECTIVE: Mental illness is noted for being in one of the first places in global burden of disease in terms of years lived with disability (YLDs). Notably, absences due to mental health problems greatly affect the world of work, and mental illness is one of the most economically important diseases. However, there is a high rate of those not seeking care in mental health, both in the general population but also in workers in private and public sectors with significant economic impacts. The aim of our study was to identify factors associated with low access to specialized psychiatric care among French Public Sector employees referred to a psychiatric expertise upon request from the Departmental Medical Board of Martinique (Comité médical départemental [CMD] de Martinique), between 2000 and 2013. METHODS: We carried out an observational and transversal study, analyzing sociodemographic and clinical data from psychiatric assessments done to help the CMD give notification on the medico-administrative situation of Public Sector employees, a large majority of whom had been on sick leave due to mental health for at least 6 months. The variable of interest - low access to psychiatric care - was defined as the absence of consultation at the time of the assessment provided by a psychiatrist since at least 12 months. Descriptive analyses were performed first, then univariate analysis using a non-adjusted binary logistic regression model, to identify factors associated with low access to psychiatric care. Finally, multivariate analyses using a binary logistic regression model were performed after excluding non-relevant factors (with significance level above 5%) during the univariate analysis. A significance threshold of 0.05 was adopted for all of the statistical analyses. RESULTS: We retrospectively analysed the records of 516 Public Sector employees. Two hundred and ninety-three subjects (57% of the population) had a low access to psychiatric care as part of their regular clinical follow-up, even the 81% who were identified has having had psychiatric antecedents (55% with 'mood disorders', and 17% with 'neurotic, stress-related and somatoform disorders'). Moreover, psychiatric expertise found a psychiatric diagnostic in 96 % of cases, mostly 'mood disorders', 'neurotic, stress-related and somatoform disorders' and 'personality disorders'. For mood disorders, clinical characteristics of episodes were defined as 'severe' or 'with psychotic symptoms' in many cases. Suicidal thoughts were found in 96 subjects (18%) during the expertise. Fewer than half of the subjects (43%) had a specialized psychiatric care (mostly subjects with 'mood disorders' and 'psychotic disorders') and 41% only had care by a general practitioner (mostly subjects with 'neurotic, stress-related and somatoform disorders'). In most of the cases, psychotropic drugs were insufficiently and inadequately prescribed. Using multivariate analysis, we found a significant association between low access to psychiatric care and: being masculine, having had more than two children, having had personal life events (in particular chronic somatic diseases), and having had no history of mental illness or of psychiatric hospitalization. It appears that chronic somatic diseases are frequently associated with psychiatric diseases, and the association worsens the prognosis of the two disorders. However, even if employees with mental disorders associated with chronic somatic diseases are unfit for work, many of them do not have access to mental health care and only have care by a general practitioner. CONCLUSION: More than half of French Public Sector employees referred to the Departmental Medical Board of Martinique for a medico-administrative decision relevant to sick leave due to mental diseases, had low access to specialized psychiatric care. By identifying barriers to care and reasons for not seeking specialized mental health care, we would be able to prevent disability claims and days off work (predicting malaise in the workplace and health-related limitations). Our results demonstrate the need to strengthen existing partnerships, and thus enhancing cooperation between public psychiatric sectors and primary healthcare players, facilitating access to mental healthcare and decreasing the stigma about mental disorders.

[Psychological effects of emergency calls management on medical dispatcher assistants in a SAMU-Center 15]. / Répercussions psychologiques de la prise en charge des appels d'urgence sur les assistants de régulation médicale (ARM) d'un SAMU­Centre 15.

INTRODUCTION: In France, the emergency call center is called SAMU (service d'aide médicale d'urgence). The Medical Dispatcher Assistant (MDA) is the first responder and is exposed to first calls of distress and has a high risk of stress disorder. AIM: Psychological impact of emergency calls on MDA. METHOD: National multicenter prospective study from January to August 2018 by electronic surveys, including all MDA of 13 SAMU, subdivided in 5 sections: population characteristics, PCL-5 scale (DSM-5) assessing post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), ProQOL assessing professional quality of life, call categories and an MDA's emotional perception, and work impacts on an MDA's quality of life. Univariate descriptive statistical analysis of the group with PCL-5≥34 (=complete PTSD group) and with PCL-5<34 (=group without complete PTSD). RESULTS: Of 400 MDA asked to be interviewed, 283 (71 %) replied of whom 72 % (205) were women and 28 % (79) men. Age groups: 9 % (25) for 18-25 yrs, 39 % (110) for 26-35 yrs, 31 % (89) 36-45 yrs, 15 % (43) 46-55 yrs and 6 % (16) for more than 56 yrs. All MDA reported having been exposed to death experience. For 46 % (129) the most recent traumatic event occurred within the last 7 months. 78 % (219) have reported intense fear, feeling helpless, or even sensed horror when answering the calls. 97 % (273) could talk about it with colleagues but only 64 % (180) with family. 72 % (203) felt lack of recognition at work. 78 % (220) had no knowledge about psycho-traumatic disorder. While 11 % (30) suffered symptoms suggestive of a complete PTSD, 15 % (42) an incomplete PTSD, 3 % (8) suffer burnout and 4 % (11) compassion fatigue, none reported secondary traumatic stress. The only significant difference (P<0.05) between the two groups characteristics was on the education level. 74 % (22) of the MDA with a complete PTSD had a High School diploma or less. MDA with symptoms suggestive of complete PTSD developed significantly (P<0.001) more stress reduction strategies (alcohol, drugs, medication) (13 % vs 2 %), had more food disorders (80.5 % vs 38 %), more sleeping problems (75.5 % vs 21 %), more anxiety (67 % vs 17 %), and more sick leaves (13 % vs 4 %) than the group without complete PTSD. CONCLUSION: Part of the surveyed MDAs showed symptoms suggestive of PTSD. The study highlights that MDAs is a vulnerable population, and PTSD prevention techniques should be systematically implemented for them. The study also highlights that a higher education level prevents the psycho traumatic process with its accompanying disorders.

Mental health of jail inmates within the prison of Ducos, Martinique - a cross-sectional descriptive study.

BACKGROUND: Prisoners' sociocultural backgrounds and prison environments have an influence on detainees' psychopathology; complex judicial and public policies are also to be taken into account in the dynamics of that environment. Scientific literature shows a wide range prison inmates' profiles across the world. However, very little data about the mental health of Caribbean jail inmates has been published. Martinique is a French overseas administrative district in the Caribbean, with a population of about 400,000 inhabitants. Its only prison is located in the city of Ducos. Our study proposes a description of the psychiatric characteristics of jail inmates in Martinique with epidemiological tools. Its objectives are to highlight their specific features and compare them to mainland France's jail population. METHODS: The initial study was a multicenter cross-sectional survey conducted in 18 French prisons. The selection was done using a two-stage stratified sampling strategy. For the purpose of our study, two groups were defined and compared: the detainees from the prison of Ducos (n=100) were compared to inmates from mainland France (n=698). Current psychiatric diagnoses were rigorously collected, through clinical and semi-structured interviews. We conducted a multiple logistic regression for each assessed mental disorder. Each prisoner gave us his oral and written informed consent. RESULTS: In terms of sociodemographic characteristics, we found more children per prisoner in the Martinican group and a better educational status in the mainland France group. The inmates from Martinique had significantly more adverse experiences in their childhood and the length of incarceration at the time of the interview was longer in the Martinique sample. Major depressive disorders (aOR=0.51; 95% CI=0.26-0.95) and psychotic disorders (aOR=0.24; 95% CI=0.08-0.57) were significantly less frequent in the Martinique sample. The data concerning substance-related disorders showed significant differences in bivariate analysis but this link was no longer statistically significant in the multiple logistic regression analysis. CONCLUSION: Even if imprisonment conditions are extremely tough, the inmates carry the heavy burden of difficult family histories, and the use of cannabis seems to be a major problem, it appears that Martinique's jail inmates have lower rates of mental illness than their counterparts from mainland France. We think this could be due to the benefit of greater proximity to their relatives and a united community, both which may contribute to lower prevalence of mental disorders.

[First stage in identifying traumatic profil inpatients hospitalised in psychiatry in Martinique]. / Premières identifications d'un profil traumatique chez des patients hospitalisés en psychiatrie en Martinique.

The population hospitalised in psychiatry seems more exposed to traumatic events than the French general population, with particularly more sexual aggressions. The aim of this study is to describe the population hospitalised in psychiatry and more precisely the traumatic history of these patients, their comorbidities (mental diseases and addictions), and socio economical level. This descriptive, cross sectional and retrospective study took place in the Crisis Center in the University Hospital in Martinique (French West Indies), from February to July 2013. A socio-demographic information, the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview 5.0, the Trauma History Questionnaire and the Impact Events Scale-Revised were realised with 49 of the 143 patients admitted during this period (34.3%). In this population, we found a mean of 6.5 (standart-deviation=4.2) different types of traumatic event, with 38.8% patients reporting a natural disaster, and 38.8% declaring at least one sexual aggression. In the 25 patients suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder, 66.7% underwent a sexual aggression, significatively during childhood (before 10 years old, P=0.01), and during adolescence (between 10 to 18 years old, P=0.01). These results underline the importance of a systematic screening of the traumatic profile: the characteristics of the traumatic events and its clinical impact.

[Prevalence of trauma-related disorders in the French WHO study: Santé mentale en population générale (SMPG)]. / Prévalence des troubles psychotraumatiques en France métropolitaine.

INTRODUCTION: Trauma-related disorders are disabling affections of which epidemiological data change according to the country, population and measuring instruments. The prevalence of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) appears to have increased over the past 15 years, but one cannot tell whether it has indeed increased or whether the standardized procedure has improved. Moreover, very few epidemiologic studies among the general population have been conducted in Europe, notably in France. DESIGN OF THE STUDY: The "Santé mentale en population générale" (SMPG) survey, that took place in France between 1999 and 2003 among more than 36 000 individuals, gives an estimation of the prevalence of psychotraumatic disorders in the general population. Multi-varied analyses were performed on PTSD-related variables and comorbid disorders. The instantaneous prevalence (past month) of PTSD was of 0.7% among the whole SMPG sample, with almost the same proportion of men (45%) and women (55%). There was a high rate of comorbidity among PTSD individuals, notably with mood disorders, anxiety disorders and addictive behaviour. There was an obvious relationship with suicidal behaviour, with 15-fold more suicide attempts during the past month among the PTSD population. RESULTS: This survey analysed the consequences of a psychic traumatism over and above complete PTSD according to DSM-IV criteria, observing for instance the consequences for people exposed both to a trauma and suffering from at least one psychopathological symptom since the trauma. Those who suffered from a psychotraumatic syndrome, according to our enlarged definition, represented 5.3% of the population, half suffered from daily discomfort and a third of them used medication. Then, we compared those psychotraumatic syndromes to complete PTSD from a sociodemographic, functional and type of care point of view. There was little difference in prevalence of PTSD between men and women in the SMPG survey (45% vs 55%), which is clearly distinct from the other epidemiologic surveys named above. Regarding age, as in the ESEMeD survey, anxiety disorders appeared to be more frequent among younger people. The originality of the SMPG survey is obviously in the fact that it studied the functional impact of the psychic disorder, the type of care and the satisfaction level after care. Only 50% of the PTSD population feels sick which is, however, twice as high as for the psychotraumatized population. This doesn't fit either with the fact that 100% of the PTSD population say they feel uncomfortable with other people. The type of care is in the same vein: 50% of psychotherapies and 75% of medication, but also 25% of mild medicines and 25% of traditional medicines. Moreover, among the drugs, antidepressants (that are still the first choice treatment in all international recommendations) represent only 30%, whereas anxiolytics, hypnotics and phytotherapy represent the remaining 70%. DISCUSSION: Regarding the type of care, the differences between the psychotraumatized population and the PTSD population are obvious. They are obvious in that which concerns the type of care, since the medication is similar. From a very global point of view, patients suffering from a subsyndromal PTSD rarely choose medical care (religion, mild or traditional medicine), while full PTSD patients definitely choose classical medical care (drugs, psychotherapy, and 30% of hospitalization). The prevalence of those who ask for care is very close to that observed in the ESEMeD survey, which was four individuals out of 10 suffering from PTSD. CONCLUSION: The SMPG data show that its necessary to maintain the distinction between subsyndromal PTSD and full PTSD since the populations differ, but both need care.

[Clarifying the definition of bullying]. / Précision de la définition du harcèlement moral au travail.

INTRODUCTION: Bullying is a much discussed and studied concept and yet there is a huge amount of terms and definitions that describe it. The lack of unity and precision around bullying raises several questions, notably in the judicial field. Indeed, how can judges determine if a given situation comes close to bullying or not if they do not have a precise definition of what bullying consists in? The French law attempts to clarify this concept, but it still remains vague on several points, highlighting the effects of bullying without explaining its causes and nature. OBJECTIVE: This study aims at providing further precisions on the definition and bases itself on the analysis of law cases. These show which criteria the judges use to determine if the victim has been bullied or not. METHOD: In this study, we used the judgments published on the website of the French ministry of justice in which a situation of bullying had been proven. Seventy-two percent of the victims were women whereas 75% of the perpetrators were men. RESULTS: The great majority (91%) of the persons convicted of bullying had a higher hierarchical position than their victims. No case from a subordinate to a superior could be found. Nine percent of the cases were bullying between colleagues. The average seniority was 15 years. The facts that influence the judges' decisions are always dignity-undermining facts, which are frequently combined with an alteration in the victim's health, an endangering of the victim's career and, less often, with the non-respect of the worker's rights. Dignity-undermining consists in humiliations (in 61% of the cases), insults or discourteous comments (27%), disrepute of the victim's work (24%), unjustified sanctions or reproaches, attacks on private life (15%), isolation (15%) and overload of work (12%). In half of the cases, alteration in health is held as the consequence of bullying. The judges mention some anxiodepressive syndroms or psychological problems without providing any supplementary details. No PTSD-like symptomatology has, for now, been mentioned although since the end of the 1990s, the relationship between bullying and clinical symptoms of PTSD has been proven by many researchers. In 31% of the cases, the judges mention some facts that endanger the victim's career and in 20%, the worker's rights have not been respected (wages not paid...). DISCUSSION: Very often, the judges use some other criteria related to the conditions which caused the appearance of bullying, to the kind of bullying the victim had to face and to the circumstances that enabled the situation to continue. Moreover, the judges try to determine if the negative acts described above have been repeated in time. The average number of the facts that influence the judges to determine if a situation is or is not a bullying situation is seven. The criterion related to the conjunction of different kinds of consequences (dignity undermining, non-respect of rights, alteration in health and endangering the professional future) is found in 90% of the cases. The duration of bullying does not seem to be a determining factor. The shortest length we found was six months and the average was three years. The judges nearly always refer to written documents (medical certificates, affidavits by colleagues or former employees, contracts of employment, internal documents, etc.) that must be detailed and in agreement.

[Peritraumatic distress prospectively predicts PTDS symptoms in assault victims]. / L'intensité de la détresse péritraumatique prédit la survenue des symptômes post-traumatiques parmi des victimes d'agressions.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Among the peritraumatic reactions after a traumatic event, one best identifies dissociation as a predictor of serious post-traumatic problems. The dimension of emotional distress is recent in the literature and we have attempted to identify how it may contribute to the prediction of the evolution of post-traumatic symptoms. METHOD: 1. Population. Victims of individual aggression and those of a hold-up were recruited consecutively in the Paris area from five consulting centers. Individuals who had lost consciousness, had psychotic or dementia problems, or had a serious somatic patho-logy were excluded. Overall, we included 101 individuals with a traumatic experience (DSM IV criteria) that took place in the past 12 months. Two evaluations with a six-month interval were made. The first involved a face-to-face consultation with a clinician and the second required the individuals to complete self-reports. 2. Instruments. The Peritraumatic Distress Inventory (PDI) was administered to measure peritraumatic emotional distress, in the first phase. The Peritraumatic Dissociative Experience Questionnaire (PDEQ) was used to measure the intensity of the trauma and the dissociation, in this first phase. The Impact of Event Scale Revised (IES-R) was administered to assess the severity of the PTSD symptoms, in the first phase and at six months. The Mini International Neuropsychiatry Interview (MINI) was used in diagnosing depression and PTSD. RESULTS: Among the 63 subjects who were followed-up after the initial meeting and completed the second half of the study, 29 were victims of physical assault, 20 of a hold-up, 7 of a robbery, and 5 were confronted with another menacing situation; thus 40 were victims of aggression. According to the first consultation, 46 individuals presented symptoms of PTSD and 22 presented an episode of major depression. Between those who were followed-up for the whole study and those who dropped out after the initial consultation there were no significant differences with regards to gender, type of aggression, initial PDI scores (t=0.38, df=96, p=.7), PDEQ scores (t=0.7, df=96, p=0.94), or IES-R scores (t=0.23, df=97, p=0.082). Individuals who were victims of physical or sexual assault showed higher scores on the IES-R than individuals who claimed no such assault. The scores for peritraumatic dissociation were correlated with the initial IES-R scores with a correlation coefficient of 0.50. The scores from the PDEQ and the initial PDI were correlated with the IES-R scores at six months with a coefficient of 0.63. Using a multi-hierarchical linear regression controlling for type of experience, it appeared that the score of peritraumatic distress improved the variance by 14% in predicting the IES-R score at six months, compared to the prediction of the score of the initial IES-R. DISCUSSION: This is the first study using a prospective inquiry to demonstrate the power of the peritraumatic emotional distress score. Our results suggest that the type of trauma is a strong predictor of prognosis at six months. Despite our small sample size, the absence of significant differences between the drop-out group and our subjects reduces the probability of a bias in our selection criteria to explain our results. This study points to the fact that the measurement of peritraumatic emotional distress (PDI) is a good predictor of PTSD symptoms six months down the road. This study underlines the importance of an initial psychotraumatic consultation to identify the type of trauma and to measure the intensity of the peritraumatic symptoms in order to predict the severity of the evolution.

[Acute catatonic syndrome after neuroleptic malignant syndrome]. / Syndrome catatonique et syndrome malin des neuroleptiques (à propos d'un cas).

We report the case of a young woman who deve-loped catatonic syndrome a few days after neuroleptic mali-gnant syndrome (NMS), arising the problem of the chronology of both affections. A 20-year old woman with an history of bipolar disorder, experienced an acute manic syndrome that made hospitalization necessary. Fourteen days after loxa-pine prescription, the patient developed a NMS (DSM IV criteria) dyskinesia, dysphagia, fever and alteration of cons-ciousness. Hepatic transaminases and muscular enzymes increased. Neuroleptic was immediately interrupted and benzodiazepines (Lorazepam) was started. Biological parameters were normalized after 7 days, hyperpyrexia decreased and extrapyramidal symptoms disappeared but manic symptoms persisted. Two weeks later, the patient presented nega-tivism, rigidity of the four limb, catalepsia and hyperpyrexia. She also had been anxious for death and presented auditory hallucinations. Bacteriological samples and computed tomography were normal. This catatonic symptoms did not decreased and electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) was necessary. After six ECT, she started standing up, walking, taking food and speaking. After 12 ECT, the clinical state was the same as it was before the acute episod. The patient was then treated with valproate and lorazepam for anxiety symptoms. Acute catatonie, a rare and life-threatening acute syndrome was described in psychosis before the advent of neuroleptic drugs. It's characterized by hyperexia, stupor alternated with exctement, rigidity. Many etiolologic factors have been reported for this affection: psychogenic, organic or toxic. Neuroletic malignant syndrome is a potentially fatal complication of neuroleptic treatment occuring in about 1% of patients treated with neuroleptic. This syndrome is characterised by consciousness alteration, extrapyramidal symptoms, autonomic and thermic disorders. Similar clinical and biological features in catatonia and neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) suggest a relationship between both affections and common physiopathological mechanisms and neurochemical basis: a central dopamine deficiency. We believe like many authors that catatonia and NMS are two aspects of a same disease, arising the question of chronology of both affections: NMS precipitates catatonia evolution. In the same way, Revuelta reported a case of patient who presented a lethal catatonia worsened by neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Neuroleptic malignant syndrome may be related to a dopamine deficiency, predominantly in the basal ganglia and antérior hypothalamus. Dopaminergic impairment has also been postulated to explain hyperthermia and catatonic signs in acute catatonie. ECT increases cerebral concentrations of dopamine, GABA and noradrelanine. The efficacy of ECT also argues for the dopaminergic hypothesis. A relation between those syndromes are complexes. A catatonic syndrome is regard as an acute form of malignant syndrome. In the other way, a severity scores of malignant syndrome are correlated among catatonic signs. In this case report, we suggest that the neuroleptic malignant syndrome accelerate the evolution to catatonic syndrome.

[Prospective study of post-traumatic stress in victims of terrorist attacks]. / Etude prospective de l'état de stress post-traumatique parmi des victimes d'un attentat terroriste.

In 1995-96 several terrorist attacks struck Paris. After that, the French government decided to optimize the service claimed to treat psychological repercussions of attacks victims. For this reason we need to better understand the psychopathology developing after these traumatic events in order to adjust the various steps of the treatment. In December 1996, a terrorist attack occurred in a Paris subway. Medical and medico-psychological teams intervened immediately on the site to help victims. Among 115 victims, 4 persons died and 35 were seriously injured. The aim of our study was to evaluate the psychological impact among a population of terrorist attacks victims by a prospective study and to identify predictive factors of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). We evaluated PTSD rates at 6 and 18 months, the relationship between coping style and PTSD, and whether PTSD increased health care utilization. Two follow up evaluations were performed in the 6th and 7th month respectively, by means of self-questionnaires sent by mail. Among 115 victims of the bombing attack occurred in December 1996, the 111 survivors were asked to participate to the study. The subjects who accepted and could use French questionnaires were considered eligible for the inclusion: the main criteria of the Watson's PTSD Inventory for the specific post-traumatic symptoms were used; the Goldberg's General Health Questionnaire was used to measure the general psychopathology; to identify coping styles we used the questionnaire "Ways of Coping Check List" of Vitaliano at 6 months and the "Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations (CISS)" by Endler at 18 months; a small questionnaire was proposed to evaluate injuries, hospitalization and specific treatment immediately or after the event. Among 70 subjects who accepted to participate, 56 (33 females) could be evaluated at 6 months and 32 (14 females) subjects at 18th months. The mean age at 6 months was 38.4 years: 41% of participants met PTSD criteria at 6 months, 34.4% still had PTSD at 18 months; at 18th months, 50% subjects presented GHQ scores higher than 3, corresponding to the cut-off revealing mental suffering; people hospitalized more than two days immediately after the event presented significantly lower PTSD scores at 6 months. General characteristics of risks factors for PTSD were: at 6 and 18 months, women and younger people presented significantly higher PTSD scores; for the CISS at 18 months Emotion-oriented coping correlated significantly with PTSD (r = 0.49, p = 0.007), while task-oriented coping and PTSD correlated negatively (r = -0.39; p = 0.04). Avoidance coping's styles were not correlated with PTSD. About predictive factors: the GHQ-12 and PTSD-I scores at 6 months were significantly correlated with PTSD-I scores at 18 months (respectively r = 0.73, p = 0.018 and r = 0.75, p = 0.0029); by a multiple regression we observed that PTSD-I score at 6 months predicted the PTSD-I score at 18 months, adjusted on sex and age. The others characteristics at 18 months were: medication use increased significantly at 18 months; people who lived another traumatic event since December 1996 presented a 18 month PTSD score higher than the other victims. In spite of the small size of this sample, the principal interest of this study is the prospective data in a population exposed by the same traumatic event. We note the high score of PTSD at 18 months. Terrorism exposure resulted in persisting PTSD in a significant proportion of victims; this was related to coping style. Moreover PTSD increased health care utilization. We discuss these results comparing with other similar populations in France, Israel and USA. We discuss overall the role of coping styles during the time after an attack; we insist on considering this aspect in the therapeutic strategies. These data contribute to inform that people with a high PTSD score at 6 months presented a high risk to suffer PTSD at 18 months. These results underline the importance of early diagnosis to propose early medical and psychological help to the victims.